|
Post by Stephen on Jan 23, 2010 16:35:53 GMT -5
HONOR ROLL TEEN BEATEN BY COPS FOR HOLDING MOUNTAIN DEWby Will Grigg When 18-year-old Pittsburgh resident Jordan Miles was surrounded by three disreputable-looking men on the way to his grandmother’s house, he did the entirely sensible thing: He fled, thinking that the marauders were criminals. Unfortunately for Miles, his assailants weren’t common criminals, but rather the state-employed variety — undercover police officers. Street criminals would likely have left him alone. The police not only severely beat him but — in keeping with standard procedure — accused him of several supposed crimes, including “loitering,” “resisting arrest,” and “aggravated assault” (presumably by staining the fists of his assailants with his blood). When the undercover officers materialized, the honor student ran three steps before slipping and falling to the sidewalk, whereupon the heroic guardians of the public weal attacked him with a stun gun and beat him with fists, knees, and a branch — and tore out a huge chunk of hair for good measure. (See photos of the beating victim here - www.wpxi.com/slideshow/news/22317285/detail.html.)The hired thugs claimed in a criminal report that the 5′6″, 150-pound viola player looked “suspicious” and appeared to be armed with a “heavy object”; the weapon in question proved to be a bottle of Mountain Dew, an admittedly deadly concoction but one that is dangerous only to those who consume it. As is usually the case in incidents of this kind, the assailants described their assault in self-serving terms. The report claims that the tax-engorged bullies identified themselves as police, a morally inconsequential detail disputed by the victim. When Miles tried to free himself, the officers “delivered 2-3 closed fist strikes to Miles’ head/face with still no effect,” and then inflicted a “knee strike to Miles’ head causing him to momentarily stop resisting,” so that handcuffs could be slapped on the victim’s wrists. The victim later recalled that “I thought I was going to die” beneath the courageous ministrations of Pittsburgh’s, ahem, “finest.” All of this abuse was justified, the report insists, because it was used only “to subdue the teenager as he tried to get away,” in the words of a CNN summary. A rapist who beats a would-be victim can make exactly the same claim, of course. The supposed men responsible for this crime have been “punished” by being re-assigned to duty as uniformed officers. Their identity, unlike that of the victim, is being withheld from the public.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Jan 25, 2010 10:49:25 GMT -5
24-YEAR OLD FATHER MURDERED BY POLICE IN EXECUTION-STYLE KILLING
Last July 20, two men engaged in a brief altercation in Kasota, Minnesota. One of them was unarmed and wearing nothing but swim trunks. The other, dressed in regular clothes, was carrying a gun, which he used to pump several rounds into the first man’s chest at point-blank range.
This killing of an unarmed man was witnessed by more than a dozen people, all of whom — except, apparently, one — described it as undisguised murder. Yet a grand jury has refused to indict the killer, who — as should be obvious to any reasonably observant person — was a police officer.
The victim, 24-year-old stay-at-home father Tyler Heilman, had just ended a brief swim in a nearby lake and was clad only in swim trunks when he was stopped by Deputy Todd Waldron of the LeSeur County Sheriff’s Office for an alleged traffic violation.
The encounter in the parking lot of an apartment complex quickly became testy and degenerated into a physical altercation, one that some witnesses say Waldron — who was “working undercover” — was losing.
Kris Hoehn, a childhood friend of Heilman who witnessed the incident, recalls that his friend confronted the unidentified man who had been tailgating him in a Dodge Durango. To Hoehn it seemed apparent that his friend was unsure of the identity of the individual in street clothes who presumptuously demanded identification, and he understandably fought back when that unidentified stalker grabbed him by the shoulders.
Waldron was reportedly investigating an “unrelated matter” when he turned his lethal attention to Heilman. The young father might have suspected that he was being followed by a common criminal. If that had been the case, he most likely would still be alive.
According to witnesses, after his “good enough for government `work’” unarmed combat skills proved inadequate to subdue Heilman, Waldron pulled his gun and shot Heilman at least three, and perhaps four, times in the chest. He didn’t identify himself as a police officer or issue a warning of any kind.
At the time, Heilman was backing away with his hands raised as if in surrender.
One of the rounds fired by Waldron damaged a local apartment, most likely putting the life of yet another innocent person at risk.
Among the eyewitnesses to the killing were Jolene Manderfield and her children, who reside in the apartment building and were in the parking lot when Waldron shot Heilman. Jolene’s husband Scott heard the gunshots and raced to the scene to administer CPR in a futile attempt to save the life of the young father.
“When I ran outside, [Waldron] had his gun out,” recalled Scott Manderfield. “I asked who he was and he said he was a cop. He told me to help him flip Tyler over, then he said, `What have I done?’ He was running around frantic.”
Scott and Jolene Manderfield, along with their children Brooke and Eric, testified before a grand jury considering an indictment against Waldron. Eric, 13, was a passenger in Heilman’s vehicle and witnessed the execution-style murder at close range.
After hearing testimony from more than twenty witnesses, the grand jury decided — and wasn’t the suspense just unbearable? — that no charges would be filed against the killer. This permitted Andrew Johnson, assistant attorney for Anoka County, to claim — apparently in all seriousness — that the deputy acted in self-defense when he gunned down an unarmed, barely clothed man who was backing away with his hands raised.
Johnson claims that the grand jury was persuaded by a conveniently anonymous witness who “happened to be driving by and … saw it,” and whose account “is very similar to what the officer said and it contradicts what the witnesses at the scene said.” Johnson refused to provide details of both Waldron’s account and that of the mystery witness, promising that his office “will have more on that very soon,” albeit not “next week.”
Chances are pretty good that this conveniently anonymous and corroborative witness was a fellow member of Waldron’s local fraternity of officially sanctioned bully-boys: Waldron has acknowledged that he called for “backup” as he stalked Heilman to the parking lot. This would explain how such a helpful witness just happened to be “driving by” at the time of the killing, and why grand jurors would defer to his account rather than those of witnesses much closer to the action.
“He went from playing down at the river, living the life, to being shot down in what is practically his own backyard,” Kirs Hoehn said of his murdered friend. “He was a 24-year-old guy with a young son,” a 3-year-old named Haydin.
Immediately after the grand jury’s decision, Waldron’s paid vacation (aka “administrative leave”) was brought to an end and he was returned to the force with his license to murder fully restored.
Sheriff Dave Glisinski told reporters that “it’s great to have him back. He’s a professional investigator and a key to the force.” That comment reveals much about the nature of Sheriff Glisinski’s “force” and its standards of “professionalism.”
Whatever else can be said about Waldron, he is a living argument on behalf of the proposition that government police are consistently a greater menace to life, liberty, and property than private criminals could ever be.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 1, 2010 22:26:27 GMT -5
Oklahoma State Trooper Assaults, Attempts to Arrest EMT Headed for Hospital by William Grigg on May 28, 2009 12:08 PM
Who cares about the needs of a critical care patient when there’s a State Trooper’s hungry ego to feed?
Emergency Medical Technician Maurice White, Jr., a paramedic with the Creek Nation EMS in Oklahoma, was shuttling a patient to the hospital when he was stopped by a State Trooper. White, intent on getting the patient the care she needed, hadn’t noticed that the trooper had been behind him with lights flashing; when the trooper zoomed by, he made radio contact and snarled at White that he “should consider checking [his] rear view mirrors.”
A little while later the Trooper, operating his vehicle with typical recklessness, cut off a car driven by a family member of the patient and signaled for White to pull over. Seeing a woman sitting next to the Trooper, and thinking she might need medical care, White complied — only to find himself under assault and the subject of a spurious arrest on the way to the hospital.
Several other brown-shirted state police materialized, and White was swarmed; at one point, one of the state stormtroopers had his hand on White’s throat.
Once again, in keeping with the quasi-official media protocol, this episode was described by local ABC affiliate news as a “scuffle” or a “confrontation,” rather than a criminal assault by several armed tax-feeders on a medical professional in the course of carrying out a task that actually helps people, rather than harassing or plundering them.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 0:19:21 GMT -5
This one from overseas...
AUSTRALIAN MAN ASSAULTED FOR KISSING EXALTED DOG
Apparently, whatever has infected American police officers is rapidly spreading through the Anglosphere. This would explain why an unidentified man from St. Marys, Australia, was recently pepper-sprayed and arrested by police for the supposed crime of patting — and reportedly trying to kiss — a police dog named Bodie.
After being attacked with a low-grade chemical weapon and abducted at gunpoint, the man was charged with “assaulting a police officer, resisting a police officer and failing to leave licensed premises when directed,” reported the Rouse Hill Times of New South Wales, Australia.
“We will allege the accused tried to kiss or touch the dog,” sniffed Wayne Murray, a bureaucrat bearing the grand title “Detective Chief Inspector.” “The dog handler moved in and got between the man and the dog while other police came in to protect Bodie.”
Yes, the Australian tax-feeders, just like their American counterparts, are indoctrinated to see canine “officers” as part of their exalted caste, and to treat unsanctioned physical contact by a mere Mundane as a form of criminal assault.
“The police dog is considered to be part of the policing contingent and the same security measures are taken as if it were a police officer,” insisted Murray, perhaps oblivious to the oblique admission that police are trained to protect themselves from the public, rather than protecting the public against criminal violence.
As previously noted in this space, in the United States police dogs — oh, forgive me; “K-9 officers” — are likewise treated as full-fledged members of their police units and clothed in the same privileges and immunities enjoyed by their human colleagues. This includes taxpayer-funded paramilitary funerals for “K-9 officers” who die “in the line of duty.”
While it is considered a felony for a Mundane to touch a “K-9 officer” or even to make verbal or non-verbal “threats” against one, police routinely kill privately owned dogs with impunity.
|
|
noski
Captain
"Richthofen lived where the rest of us go , only in our greatest moments." Udet
Posts: 286
|
Post by noski on Feb 3, 2010 10:00:27 GMT -5
Keep posting the activities of these criminals ! People need to know. I'll bet this site is already on someone's watch list for using your free speach right tho.... WE are now the'enemy' .
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 10, 2010 23:20:15 GMT -5
August 10, 2009 Tax-Feeders and Manufactured “Crimes” by William Grigg on August 10, 2009
Government is an exercise in pure, wasteful consumption. The only things that government can actually “make” are criminals out of innocent people, and corpses out of living human beings.
Statists often insist that at least some of government’s purely consumptive activity is indispensable, such as law enforcement. But this argument ignores the fact that the first and most important function of police is to collect revenue for the state, and that rather than deterring crimes police often manufacture them.
For example: police departments nation-wide use “bait cars” — automobiles abandoned by the side of the road with the keys still in the ignition and surveillance equipment concealed at various points — to pique the curiosity of well-intentioned people. Any contact with the vehicle, or close inspection of the same, is then treated as an attempt to burglarize or steal the car — even if the intent were only to learn the identity of the owner.
Police in Austin, Texas recently sprang a trap of that kind on Mark Douglas Ledford and his girlfriend, Asia Ward.
Austin’s “Finest” parked a green Honda Accord near Ledford’s home. Curious, Ledford consulted with his neighbors in the hope of identifying an owner; then he reported the vehicle to the police. A pair of officers paid a brief visit to the neighborhood and spoke briefly with Ledford.
“I told them, `Isn’t it strange that someone parked their car there with the windows down and the keys in it?’” he recalled. The police replied that there was no problem, since the car was parked legally, and then left.
Puzzled by the apparent indifference of the police and worried that the car might be a crime scene, Ledford and his girlfriend decided to examine the vehicle in the hope of learning the identity of its owner. They noticed odd things, such as broken glass, a pair of men’s work boots, a length of rope, and a bikini top in the back seat; this made them wonder if the car belonged to a serial killer.
Practically the instant that the couple approached the abandoned vehicle, a police cruiser sped to the scene and Ledford and Ward were arrested. At the station they waived their right to counsel and tried to explain their concerns to the on-scene investigator, who released them immediately.
However, a few days later the couple was served with an arrest warrant signed by the same investigator, who accused them of burglary.
The county prosecutor offered the couple a deferred prosecution if they signed a confession; to their credit, Ledford and Ward — who face a year in jail and a $4,000 fine for committing no crime — gave the prosecutor anatomically detailed instructions regarding the proper disposal of that offer.
According to the police agency that afflicts the City of Austin, the “bait car” scheme produced 70 warrants or arrests in 2008 and 13 so far this year. The department refused to specify how many convictions resulted, and refused to provide a break-down of the charges.
As noted above, “bait car” traps have been laid by police all over the country. Police also use variants of this idea: A few years ago the NYPD, apparently having nothing better to do, enjoyed considerable success in a similar snare involving a “lost” wallet.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 10, 2010 23:29:45 GMT -5
In Boise, Idaho, police swarm, gang-tackle, and handcuff a man involved in a domestic dispute.
When he complains about impending suffocation – a very acute threat, since many victims of lethal police violence die from positional asphyxiation – he is subjected to a Taser strike in his rectum by a still-unidentified officer who threatens to strike the victim's genitals next. Subsequently one of the assailant's superiors attempts to destroy the evidence by erasing an audio taped record of the event.
In Wisconsin Dells, two callow patrolmen – Officer Beavis and Officer Butt-Head – stumble upon a couple of off-duty National Guardsmen and decide to have some fun. The police accuse the victims of urinating in public and then demand that they lick from the ground a substance they are told is human urine. When a third police officer materializes, the victims speak of filing a complaint.
This prompts the threat of a bogus burglary charge and the promise that "nobody will believe you" if they actually file a protest. As it happens, the complaint is believed – most likely because it was made by two Iraq war veterans, rather than common citizens.
These are mere snapshots of the commonplace sadism that increasingly typifies contemporary American law enforcement. But this really isn't so surprising for a country in which a bare majority, according to a recent global survey, opposes state torture.
That survey found that Americans are much likelier to support government-inflicted torture than citizens of Communist China, and marginally more indulgent of the practice than the residents of Muslim Indonesia and Muslim/socialist Egypt. Support for torture is also more widespread among Americans than among Iranians.
One might think that support for torture would be restrained by the influence of America's church-going population. One would think that those Americans who worship the Man of Sorrows who was tortured to death by the occupation forces of a pagan imperial state would be among the most insistent opponents of the vile and indefensible practice.
One would be entirely wrong, since exactly the opposite is true: A survey taken earlier this year documented that a majority (54 percent) of people who attend church at least once a week supports torture.
Perhaps the most arresting discovery was that more than sixty percent of white, evangelical Protestants condone the practice. Torture advocates of this theological persuasion profess a "personal relationship" with Jesus Christ. That relationship must be, at best, a distant and superficial one.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 10, 2010 23:47:58 GMT -5
Welcome to the New Amerikan Police State, where kids can get 5 years in a federal prison for throwing snowballs (now called "missiles" by government prosecutors) at Sanctified Government Elites.
Felony Snowball Tossing Charges Lodged Cops: Virginia college students pelted city plow, unmarked police car
FEBRUARY 9--Felony snowball throwing charges have been leveled against two Virginia college students for allegedly pelting a city plow and an undercover police car during Saturday's blizzard. Charles Gill and Ryan Knight, both 21, were nabbed by cops in Harrisonburg, where they attend James Madison University.
According to police (notice how all stories are "according to police - have you ever seen a story that began by saying "according to the accused" ??), the pair first targeted a city plow last Saturday afternoon. The tax-fattened bureaucrat responded by calling government gunmen. When police responded to the scene in a bid to identify the "assailants," their unmarked vehicle also came under an icy assault, according to a Harrisonburg Police Department press release (oh, wait... did someone say "according to police" again? Has anyone spoken to the accused yet? Who speaks for them?).
Gill and Knight, a guard on JMU's basketball team, were then apprehended and booked into jail for throwing "missiles" at occupied vehicles, a felony. Gill (top) and Knight are pictured below in Rockingham County Sheriff's Office mug shots.
Both youngsters may lose up to five years of their lives because some parasitic, tax-feeder is too arrogant to laugh when a kid socks him with a snowball.
Welcome to the New Amerikan Police state.
|
|
albpilot
Ace of Aces
Red Baron Fight XVIII Champ
I'm not frightened of terrorism, so please don't go and create a police state on my account...
Posts: 1,181
|
Post by albpilot on Feb 11, 2010 7:09:47 GMT -5
|
|
noski
Captain
"Richthofen lived where the rest of us go , only in our greatest moments." Udet
Posts: 286
|
Post by noski on Feb 11, 2010 10:46:14 GMT -5
About 10 years ago, I read a book by lawyer Jerry Spence called, "America: from freedom to slavery" Many of his predictions are now coming true. If water boarding is not torture, then the relatives of the Japanese hung by the neck until dead for water boarding US soldiers during WW2, should bring a law suit against the US government for wrongful death. I may have mentioned this in another post on this forum, but I don't think it can be said enough. The fact that a majority of Amerikans think torture is OK is proof Al Queda has won. "Amerika: Home of the Greedy and the Afraid"
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 12, 2010 12:26:23 GMT -5
February 11, 2010 Yes, I Can Break The Law: I’m a Police Officer Posted by William Grigg on February 11, 2010 04:47 PM
The totalitarian conceit that people wearing state-issued costumes are exempt from the laws that govern mere Mundanes was expressed with commendable candor by Sgt. Graig Harding of the St. George (Utah) Police Department.
“Officers break laws to keep law and order,” announced the headline of Harding’s February 3 “On the Beat” column. Harding explained that because “[t]hose who serve in law enforcement occupy a special niche in society,” they sometimes “have to break the very laws they are sworn to uphold.”
This means, for instance, “officers buy drugs to arrest sellers (which would be an illegal act for a citizen).” Note carefully how Harding distinguishes between “citizens” — those subject to laws — and “officers” — those invested with the privilege of violating laws as they deem necessary.
“On assault calls, officers often have to commit assaults, themselves, to make the offenders stop and take them into custody,” Harding continues.
Were he sufficiently honest, Harding would have admitted that a mere “citizen” who so much as touches a member of the consecrated coercive caste will be charged with “assaulting a police officer,” yet uniformed tax-feeders can often beat, electrocute, and even murder “citizens” with impunity.
Hardin might also have mentioned that police in economically distressed cities are increasingly becoming armed robbers, stealing money and property at gunpoint in the name of “asset forfeiture.” Perhaps he could have soothingly instructed his readers that it is a privilege for mere citizens to be plundered for the benefit of the Exalted Corps of Public Guardians.
“We have taken upon ourselves a sacred trust to protect and to serve you, the public,” writes Harding in words that ooze condescension. “Any officer who violates this trust will not last in this profession.”
Quite the contrary is true: The unionized Brotherhood in Blue, in collusion with the other elements of the state’s punitive priesthood, will do whatever it can to insulate officers from accountability for violating the public’s misplaced trust in them. It is when an officer violates the “trust” of the tax-consuming class that he is most likely to get in trouble.
Harding concludes his totalitarian homily with admonishing mere citizens to know their proper place, which is on their knees tugging their forelocks in abject gratitude to their sacred protector-overlords in blue:
“Instead of judging [the heroic agents of government violence] and jumping to conclusions, we owe it to them and to our children to give voice to a positive opinion: `They must be watching for someone, be after somebody, or be en route to a call.’”
“The bottom line is summed up by a saying from Winston Churchill: `We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men (and women) stand ready to visit violence on those who would do us harm,’” insists Harding, who mis-attributes that familiar authoritarian apothegm (it was supposedly coined by George Orwell, rather than the execrable Churchill).
The chastened servility demanded by Harding brings to mind a recent edict issued by a government-run school in Huangping, China: All students were instructed to “salute every passing car on you way to and from school,” supposedly as a safety measure but actually as a way of paying homage to local commissars.
To their considerable credit, this policy provoked not only widespread disobedience but a barrage of ridicule from the local public. It’s a pity that most residents of Lee Greenwood’s Amerika aren’t as contemptuous of “authority” as the typical residents of “Red” China.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 12, 2010 12:31:23 GMT -5
Paramilitary Thugs Steal Private Arms Collection Posted by William Grigg on February 11, 2010 12:43 AM
“We feel our community is safer having this kind of weaponry off the street,” intoned a spokesman for the Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts police department
Granted, the invocation of that cliche is part of the familiar gun-grabber liturgy, but it doesn’t apply here, since the “weaponry” referred to was never on the “street” to begin with. It consisted of several firearms legally purchased by 45-year-old Gregory D. Girard, a computer consultant whose wife — was her maiden name Morozov, perchance? — told the authorities about her husband’s supposedly alarming view that martial law is imminent.
Since it is unacceptable for people to believe that government agents will carry out paramilitary raids to confiscate firearms, a paramilitary force was sent to Girard’s home to confiscate his firearms.
Those weapons are now “safely” in the hands of the most dangerous criminal element in any society — the people who pull triggers and commit other acts of violence on behalf of the political class.
The statist stenographers in the local press breathlessly describe Girard’s collection of “approximately twenty” firearms — all legally purchased and duly registered — as “an alarming, nearly military-grade stockpile.” In addition to the firearms, Girard’s supposedly menacing arms cache included “several tear gas grenades and explosive pepper ball projectiles” as well as “four police batons” he had “illegally” acquired.
That’s right: Civilian disarmament is not limited to “gun control,” but includes “club control,” as well.
In the hands of the armed servants of the tax-feeding class, tear gas, pepper spray, and batons are considered “less-than-lethal” weaponry. But Girard, as a mere Mundane, isn’t permitted to own tear gas grenades and pepper ball rounds; accordingly, he was charged with four counts of possessing “an infernal device” and four counts of possessing a “dangerous weapon.”
Girard also reportedly converted his third story into an “illegal indoor firing range,” complete with what was described as an “illegal ballistic plate” (apparently possession of metal plates of a certain thickness is now impermissible without explicit government permission).
Abetted by the self-serving comments of the police who stole Girard’s property and the prosecutors who collaborated in that crime, media accounts are slathered with slimy insinuations that Girard is mentally unbalanced. (His wife, with whom he apparently has a troubled relationship, is a psychiatrist.)
Whatever we learn about Girard’s personal issues, this episode involves a dramatic and terrifying exercise of pre-emptive civilian disarmament.
More than a decade ago, the state government of nearby Connecticut enacted a “law” permitting state agents to confiscate firearms from people suspected of “dangerous” tendencies — a variation on the Soviet idea of pre-emptive punishment of “socially dangerous persons.” Whatever happens to Gregory Girard, we’re likely to see much more of this kind of thing as the Homeland Security State expands and fortifies itself.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 12, 2010 12:35:04 GMT -5
Cop “Jokes” About Murdering Innocent Citizens by William Grigg February 10, 2010
Warning - do not try this at home. If you speak any such words about a police officer, you will end up in prison for a very long time.
Rod Tuason apparently suffers from a personality disorder common to professional bullies — a tendency to think that bullying behavior is hilarious. This could explain why Tuason, a detective with the East Palo Alto Police Department, used his Facebook page to suggest that police should shoot “open carry” advocates who carry firearms in public (http://www.ktvu.com/news/22516072/detail.html).
East Palo Alto Mayor David E. Woods told a local TV station that while he disapproved of Tuason’s comments, he is “concerned — although it’s legal — about people walking around with firearms.”
What Woods means, of course, is that he’s concerned about law-abiding private citizens exercising the innate individual right to armed self-defense, rather than the fact that the community he represents plays host to scores of armed people employed as enforcers by the political caste.
Some might say that Tuason, who appears to be an aspiring stand-up comedian, should keep his day job. In fact, he should quit that job and find honest work.
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Feb 12, 2010 13:01:37 GMT -5
The fact that a majority of Amerikans think torture is OK is proof Al Queda has won. "Amerika: Home of the Greedy and the Afraid" What's worse is when people who claim to be followers of the Prince of Peace, the Lamb, and the Comforter are the most vicious supporters of torture.
|
|
Michael
Captain
Red Baron Fight XX and XXI Champion
Posts: 407
|
Post by Michael on Feb 12, 2010 15:28:34 GMT -5
The fact that a majority of Amerikans think torture is OK is proof Al Queda has won. "Amerika: Home of the Greedy and the Afraid" What's worse is when people who claim to be followers of the Prince of Peace, the Lamb, and the Comforter are the most vicious supporters of torture. If you guys didn't know before the underwear bomber clammed up he did tell the authorities that "there are more coming, I trained with them" and they got that out of him with standard "I ask a question you answer" interrogation. I care more about innocent American citizens than nut job terrorists who don't deserve enough respect to even be considered a "man at arms" so if you and your psychopath buddies are gonna try to blow up my brothers I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure that you don't. So give them these options: You don't tell us who and where your co-conspirators are and you stay in prison for a while and then get the death shot, or, you can tell us who and where your co-conspirators are and you stay in prison for life. Because that's what these scumbags deserve, they're not American citizens they should not be treated as so
|
|